Essay on George's Decision to Kill Lennie - 536 Words.
Like Candy, George would rather be the one killing his friend than having a stranger torture and end his friend’s life because he loves Lennie and wants him to have a peaceful death. George’s decision to kill Lennie prevented him from the possible verdict of a mental institution.
I believe Lennies death is It was only partially morally justified. George was Lennie’s protector and knew, more than anyone else, that he was a kind and gentle soul. He had the mind of a child but unequalled masculine strength. Hence, he committed murder without meaning to.
George is justified in killing Lennie because it’s for Lennie’s own good, he spared him a harsh death, and he prevented him from spending his life in jail, or running from the law. George is justified in killing Lennie, considering Lennie would have suffered a harsher death if George didn't’ kill him.
Lennie could be justified in a number of ways to shooting Lennie. First, George knew that the other ranchers (namely, Curley) were going to kill Lennie themselves.
Of Mice and Men: George Killed Lennie for Merciful Reasons A true friendship is one in which friends care deeply enough to anticipate one another’s needs and are willing to put their friend’s needs before their own.Their mutual love enables them to make sacrifices only to protect each other.In the novella, Of Mice and Men, by John Steinbeck, George killing Lennie is a merciful kill to save.
In conclusion, George is justified in killing Lennie. He euthanized Lennie by preventing him from suffering, realizing that Lennie would continue to harm others and himself, and he knew that Lennie was incapable of making a decision for himself. George did Lennie a favor by killing him because he prevented Lennie from getting hurt in the future.
In my opinion, Steinbeck wants us to believe that George is justified in killing Lennie and that he really has no other choice. In the 1930s, when the novel is set, there were no special education.